Best buyer fit
Best for teams with drawings, budget, and urgent schedules who need a practical ODM partner rather than consumer-grade parts.
Custom actuator development path for professional robotics teams that need to move from a CAD joint concept to working hardware without building every supplier relationship from scratch.
Use this page when the buyer is choosing a development route for a funded humanoid robot program, not browsing a standard actuator catalog.
Best for teams with drawings, budget, and urgent schedules who need a practical ODM partner rather than consumer-grade parts.
Time to first sample: Architecture and tooling dependent
The RFQ is too vague and attracts low-quality supplier replies
| Evaluation Metric | Typical Range | Buyer Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Time to first sample | Architecture and tooling dependent | Funded teams often lose months when they ask every component supplier separately instead of packaging the actuator program coherently. |
| Spec maturity | Concept, EVT, DVT, pilot | ODM work can move faster when the buyer is clear about what is frozen and what is still open. |
| RFQ completeness | Joint map, CAD status, performance targets, budget, and schedule | A complete RFQ lets review move into architecture, DFM, and evidence planning instead of a missing-data loop. |
Send enough evidence to let engineering qualify feasibility, quotation scope, prototype validation, and pilot readiness in the same review loop.
| Evidence | What to Send | Related Path |
|---|---|---|
| Joint and program baseline | Robot phase, joint map, prototype deadline, pilot date, quantity range, and responsible engineering contact. | RFQ intake |
| Architecture constraints | Motor, reducer, encoder, driver, brake, voltage, control, bearing, housing, cable, and interface constraints. | Product families |
| Load and thermal assumptions | Torque-speed targets, duty cycle, peak load duration, ambient limit, heat path, impact load, and known failure risks. | FEA and thermal review |
| Validation and inspection plan | Torque-speed, backlash, noise, thermal, electrical, dimensional, incoming, in-process, and outgoing inspection needs. | Quality validation |
| Prototype-to-pilot release data | Approved sample reference, drawing revision, BOM revision, test records, CTQ list, pilot quantity, and forecast. | Pilot control |
A solution path should shorten the distance from buyer intent to qualified hardware, while keeping prototype evidence useful for the next build stage.
Confirm the buyer problem, robot phase, custom constraint, and whether this solution path is the right starting point.
Connect the scenario to motor, reducer, encoder, brake, driver, housing, bearing, thermal, and cable decisions.
Define acceptance tests before prototype release so sample feedback can be reused during pilot planning.
Freeze drawings, BOM, CTQ dimensions, inspection gates, packing requirements, and repeat delivery expectations.
This form is prefilled with Funded Humanoid Prototype Programs. Include CAD, joint map, torque-speed target, duty cycle, envelope limits, prototype quantity, pilot schedule, and acceptance tests.
Yes, if the main constraints are clear. We can start with a feasibility review and list missing data before a formal quotation.
A clear owner, CAD baseline, torque-speed target, duty cycle, prototype budget, pilot date, and list of constraints that cannot move.
Yes. The practical path is usually to rank joints by robot risk, available CAD maturity, validation urgency, and supplier lead time.
Inquiry Email
Include target torque/speed, quantity, and delivery location.
Application Engineer
+8618857971991
Talk directly about drawings, torque-speed targets, and RFQ data gaps.